Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Other NP compounds — Import quantity
Other NP compounds — Import quantity over time
- Singapore
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 45.08 t against 42.2 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 2.88 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 121st of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.29 t | 1.96 t | 50.33 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 345.45 t | 12,765 t | 12,420 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 173.92 t | 11,927 t | 11,753 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import quantity, Singapore or Turkmenistan?
- Singapore, at 45.08 t against 42.2 t in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import quantity between Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 2.88 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and Turkmenistan rank globally for other np compounds — import quantity?
- Singapore ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 121st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf