Afghanistan vs Iraq: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 29,296 1000 USD against 25,366 1000 USD in Afghanistan, a difference of 3,930 1000 USD.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 26th and Iraq ranks 23rd of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,032 1000 USD | 232.59 1000 USD | 1,799 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 7,387 1000 USD | 7,253 1000 USD | 134.1 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 16,116 1000 USD | 19,947 1000 USD | 3,831 1000 USD | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Afghanistan or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 29,296 1000 USD against 25,366 1000 USD in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Afghanistan and Iraq?
- 3,930 1000 USD, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Iraq?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Iraq rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 26th and Iraq ranks 23rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf