Australia vs Czechia: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Australia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 13,944 1000 USD against 13,139 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 805 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 42nd and Czechia ranks 40th of 192 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,157 1000 USD | 4,435 1000 USD | 2,722 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 28,121 1000 USD | 10,901 1000 USD | 17,221 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 19,713 1000 USD | 13,375 1000 USD | 6,338 1000 USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Australia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 13,944 1000 USD against 13,139 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Australia and Czechia?
- 805 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Czechia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Czechia rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Australia ranks 42nd and Czechia ranks 40th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf