Bangladesh vs Namibia: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Bangladesh
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 46.59 1000 USD against 44.99 1000 USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.6 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 134th of 192 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 226.86 1000 USD | 147.2 1000 USD | 79.66 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 456.95 1000 USD | 384.66 1000 USD | 72.29 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 3,057 1000 USD | 87.05 1000 USD | 2,970 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Bangladesh or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 46.59 1000 USD against 44.99 1000 USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Bangladesh and Namibia?
- 1.6 1000 USD, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Namibia rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Bangladesh ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 134th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf