Chile vs Uzbekistan: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Chile
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 11,680 1000 USD against 9,679 1000 USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2,001 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 46th of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,070 1000 USD | 18.24 1000 USD | 1,052 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 4,727 1000 USD | 4,817 1000 USD | 90.56 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6,808 1000 USD | 57,726 1000 USD | 50,918 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Chile or Uzbekistan?
- Chile, at 11,680 1000 USD against 9,679 1000 USD in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Chile and Uzbekistan?
- 2,001 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Uzbekistan rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Chile ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 46th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf