Ecuador vs Tajikistan: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3,773 1000 USD against 3,052 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 721 1000 USD.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Tajikistan ranks 60th of 192 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 757.45 1000 USD | 728.49 1000 USD | 28.95 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 2,490 1000 USD | 1,733 1000 USD | 757.18 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 4,915 1000 USD | 3,803 1000 USD | 1,112 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Ecuador or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3,773 1000 USD against 3,052 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Ecuador and Tajikistan?
- 721 1000 USD, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tajikistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Tajikistan rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Tajikistan ranks 60th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf