Estonia vs Eswatini: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Estonia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 203.37 1000 USD against 150.53 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 52.84 1000 USD.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 192 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,242 1000 USD | 75.69 1000 USD | 5,166 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2010s | 1,196 1000 USD | 439.51 1000 USD | 756.49 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1,883 1000 USD | 173.5 1000 USD | 1,710 1000 USD | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Estonia or Eswatini?
- Estonia, at 203.37 1000 USD against 150.53 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Estonia and Eswatini?
- 52.84 1000 USD, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Eswatini?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Eswatini rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Estonia ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf