Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritius: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 499.44 1000 USD against 488.56 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 10.88 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 91st of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 522.39 1000 USD | 2,454 1000 USD | 1,932 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,037 1000 USD | 91.45 1000 USD | 945.71 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1,447 1000 USD | 296.66 1000 USD | 1,150 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 499.44 1000 USD against 488.56 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 10.88 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 91st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf