Lithuania vs Sweden: Other NP compounds — Import value
Other NP compounds — Import value over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 13,858 1000 USD against 10,947 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 2,911 1000 USD.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 192 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,760 1000 USD | 2,448 1000 USD | 3,313 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 19,422 1000 USD | 1,327 1000 USD | 18,095 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 14,704 1000 USD | 8,709 1000 USD | 5,996 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other np compounds — import value, Lithuania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 13,858 1000 USD against 10,947 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other np compounds — import value between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 2,911 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for other np compounds — import value?
- Lithuania ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other NP compounds — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf