Cambodia vs Libya: Other paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
Cambodia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cambodia rank
131st
Libya rank
133rd
Other paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Cambodia
- Libya
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 131st and Libya ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Libya?
- Cambodia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Libya?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Libya?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Libya rank globally for other paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Cambodia ranks 131st and Libya ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other paper and paperboard — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.