Guam vs Malawi: Other paper and paperboard — Export value, per capita
Guam
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Malawi
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Guam rank
153rd
Malawi rank
156th
Other paper and paperboard — Export value, per capita over time
- Guam
- Malawi
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Malawi ahead.
Guam ranks 153rd and Malawi ranks 156th of 176 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other paper and paperboard — export value, per capita, Guam or Malawi?
- Guam, at 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other paper and paperboard — export value, per capita between Guam and Malawi?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Malawi rank globally for other paper and paperboard — export value, per capita?
- Guam ranks 153rd and Malawi ranks 156th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other paper and paperboard — Export value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other paper and paperboard — Export value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.