Chile vs Malawi: Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import
Chile
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malawi
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
64th
Malawi rank
67th
Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import over time
- Chile
- Malawi
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Malawi ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Malawi ranks 67th of 175 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import, Chile or Malawi?
- Chile, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import between Chile and Malawi?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import?
- Chile ranks 64th and Malawi ranks 67th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.