China vs Norway: Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value

China
0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0192 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
96th
Norway rank
98th

Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value over time

  • China
  • Norway
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0192 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

China ranks 96th and Norway ranks 98th of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0163 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0736 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0691 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0374 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0183 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0191 1000 USD per square kilometre China
1990s 0.1868 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0491 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1377 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0548 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0592 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0279 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0232 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0191 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import value, China or Norway?
China, at 0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0192 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import value between China and Norway?
0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Norway rank globally for other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — import value?
China ranks 96th and Norway ranks 98th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Norway: Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-paper-and-paperboard-not-elsewhere-specified-import-value-per-square-kilometre/china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-paper-and-paperboard-not-elsewhere-specified-import-value-per-square-kilometre/china/norway/">China vs Norway: Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 7,215 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.