Armenia vs Slovakia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 2,525 t against 2,138 t in Armenia, a difference of 387 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Slovakia ahead.
Armenia ranks 10th and Slovakia ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4 t | 629.67 t | 625.67 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 763 t | 551.33 t | 211.67 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Armenia or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 2,525 t against 2,138 t in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Armenia and Slovakia?
- 387 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Slovakia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Slovakia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 10th and Slovakia ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf