Ecuador vs Slovenia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Slovenia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 572 t against 32 t in Slovenia, a difference of 540 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 17.9 times Slovenia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 15th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 31 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,296 t | 143.83 t | 2,152 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1,666 t | 32 t | 1,634 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Ecuador or Slovenia?
- Ecuador, at 572 t against 32 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 540 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 15th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf