Ecuador vs Switzerland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 1,763 t against 572 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,191 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 3.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 31 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,296 t | 3,368 t | 1,072 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 1,666 t | 2,024 t | 358.5 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Ecuador or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 1,763 t against 572 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Ecuador and Switzerland?
- 1,191 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Switzerland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Switzerland rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf