French Polynesia vs Iceland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1 t against 0 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2016 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 23rd and Iceland ranks 22nd of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.75 t | 0.25 t | 2.5 t | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 1 t | 1.33 t | 0.3333 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1 t against 0 t in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Iceland?
- 1 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 23rd and Iceland ranks 22nd of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf