French Polynesia vs Sri Lanka: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 t | 2,049 t | 2,046 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1.5 t | 67.5 t | 66 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Sri Lanka?
- French Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do French Polynesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf