Mauritius vs Slovenia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Mauritius
- Slovenia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 313 t against 32 t in Slovenia, a difference of 281 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 9.8 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Slovenia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 16th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27 t | 207 t | 180 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 192.2 t | 32 t | 160.2 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Mauritius or Slovenia?
- Mauritius, at 313 t against 32 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 281 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Mauritius ranks 16th and Slovenia ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf