Pakistan vs Philippines: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Pakistan
0 t
in 2023
Philippines
0 t
in 2023
Pakistan rank
22nd
Philippines rank
22nd
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Pakistan
- Philippines
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Philippines, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,147 t | 2,147 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0 t | 15,852 t | 15,852 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Pakistan or Philippines?
- Pakistan, at 0 t against 0 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Pakistan and Philippines?
- 0 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Pakistan ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf