Belarus vs Tunisia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity

Belarus
900 t
in 2024
Tunisia
2,019 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
25th
Tunisia rank
22nd

Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time

  • Belarus
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k200220132024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 2,019 t against 900 t in Belarus, a difference of 1,119 t.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 2.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 25th and Tunisia ranks 22nd of 93 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Belarus or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 2,019 t against 900 t in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Belarus and Tunisia?
1,119 t, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tunisia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Tunisia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
Belarus ranks 25th and Tunisia ranks 22nd of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
123 places, 2,114 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf