Eswatini vs Hungary: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Hungary
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.75 t against 0.45 t in Hungary, a difference of 0.3 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.7 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hungary ahead.
Eswatini ranks 68th and Hungary ranks 70th of 87 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.925 t | 432.75 t | 431.82 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 108.08 t | 87.45 t | 20.63 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 26.62 t | 6.58 t | 20.05 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Eswatini or Hungary?
- Eswatini, at 0.75 t against 0.45 t in Hungary as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Eswatini and Hungary?
- 0.3 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hungary?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Hungary rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 68th and Hungary ranks 70th of 87 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf