Eswatini vs Sweden: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.54 t against 0.75 t in Eswatini, a difference of 0.79 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 2.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Eswatini ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 70th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 340.03 t | 11.01 t | 329.03 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 77.05 t | 106.87 t | 29.82 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 52.5 t | 1.48 t | 51.02 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Eswatini or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.54 t against 0.75 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Eswatini and Sweden?
- 0.79 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sweden?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Sweden rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 70th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf