Finland vs Uruguay: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Finland
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 33.26 t against 23.2 t in Finland, a difference of 10.06 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.95 t | 0.09 t | 12.86 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 5.76 t | 1.25 t | 4.51 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 11.66 t | 1,930 t | 1,918 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Finland or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 33.26 t against 23.2 t in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Finland and Uruguay?
- 10.06 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Uruguay rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Finland ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf