Latvia vs Lithuania: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.05 t against 0.03 t in Latvia, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.7 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 87th and Lithuania ranks 84th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,362 t | 27.37 t | 1,335 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3,095 t | 1,317 t | 1,778 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.03 t | 0.05 t | 0.02 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.05 t against 0.03 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 0.02 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Latvia ranks 87th and Lithuania ranks 84th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf