Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.05 t against 0.03 t in Latvia, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.7 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 87th and Sri Lanka ranks 84th of 93 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,150 t | 306.59 t | 843.16 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3,472 t | 48.55 t | 3,424 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 137.41 t | 0.22 t | 137.19 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.05 t against 0.03 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.02 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Latvia ranks 87th and Sri Lanka ranks 84th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf