Algeria vs Belgium: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Algeria
- Belgium
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 2,687 1000 USD against 2,646 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 41 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.
Algeria ranks 12th and Belgium ranks 13th of 92 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.14 1000 USD | 3,621 1000 USD | 3,608 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1,637 1000 USD | 1,773 1000 USD | 135.75 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 1,784 1000 USD | 2,161 1000 USD | 376.82 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Algeria or Belgium?
- Algeria, at 2,687 1000 USD against 2,646 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Algeria and Belgium?
- 41 1000 USD, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Belgium?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Belgium rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Algeria ranks 12th and Belgium ranks 13th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf