Angola vs Sri Lanka: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Angola
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.59 1000 USD against 0.24 1000 USD in Angola, a difference of 0.35 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.5 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Angola ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 92 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.35 1000 USD | 4.45 1000 USD | 0.8967 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2020s | 2.68 1000 USD | 1.38 1000 USD | 1.3 1000 USD | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Angola or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.59 1000 USD against 0.24 1000 USD in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 0.35 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Sri Lanka rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Angola ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf