Finland vs Zimbabwe: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Finland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Finland currently reports 29.54 1000 USD against 22.64 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.9 1000 USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 92 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.54 1000 USD | 262.96 1000 USD | 259.42 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 16.9 1000 USD | 1,204 1000 USD | 1,187 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Finland or Zimbabwe?
- Finland, at 29.54 1000 USD against 22.64 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 6.9 1000 USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Finland ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf