Oman vs Sweden: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Oman
- Sweden
How they compare
Oman currently reports 1.56 1000 USD against 0.85 1000 USD in Sweden, a difference of 0.71 1000 USD.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.8 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sweden ahead.
Oman ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.33 1000 USD | 93.31 1000 USD | 89.98 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 188.45 1000 USD | 31.48 1000 USD | 156.97 1000 USD | Oman |
| 2020s | 2.17 1000 USD | 2.4 1000 USD | 0.235 1000 USD | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Oman or Sweden?
- Oman, at 1.56 1000 USD against 0.85 1000 USD in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Oman and Sweden?
- 0.71 1000 USD, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Sweden rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Oman ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 72nd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf