Albania vs Zimbabwe: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Albania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,062 t against 867.98 t in Albania, a difference of 194.02 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 189 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.26 t | 2,887 t | 2,836 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 617.7 t | 3,884 t | 3,266 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 766.93 t | 1,593 t | 825.85 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Albania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,062 t against 867.98 t in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Albania and Zimbabwe?
- 194.02 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Albania and Zimbabwe rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Albania ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf