Australia vs Kenya: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Australia
- Kenya
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1,941 t against 1,746 t in Kenya, a difference of 195 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 31st and Kenya ranks 34th of 189 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,921 t | 2,991 t | 16,931 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 17,763 t | 13,026 t | 4,737 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 2,728 t | 2,303 t | 424.64 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Australia or Kenya?
- Australia, at 1,941 t against 1,746 t in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Australia and Kenya?
- 195 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kenya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Kenya rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Australia ranks 31st and Kenya ranks 34th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf