Barbados vs Belarus: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Barbados
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.99 t against 0.75 t in Barbados, a difference of 0.24 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Barbados ranks 165th and Belarus ranks 163rd of 189 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.84 t | 5,736 t | 5,729 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 18.2 t | 652.05 t | 633.85 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 8.85 t | 228.37 t | 219.52 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Barbados or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 0.99 t against 0.75 t in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Barbados and Belarus?
- 0.24 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belarus?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Belarus rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Barbados ranks 165th and Belarus ranks 163rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf