Barbados vs Somalia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Barbados
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 0.81 t against 0.75 t in Barbados, a difference of 0.06 t.
That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 151st and Somalia ranks 150th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Somalia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.91 t | 0.1 t | 0.81 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 44.01 t | 25.08 t | 18.93 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 16.37 t | 37.91 t | 21.54 t | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Barbados or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 0.81 t against 0.75 t in Barbados as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Barbados and Somalia?
- 0.06 t, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Somalia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Somalia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Barbados ranks 151st and Somalia ranks 150th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf