Belgium vs Ecuador: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Belgium
- Ecuador
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 3,968 t against 3,108 t in Ecuador, a difference of 860 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 22nd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,465 t | 3,700 t | 1,235 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 826.4 t | 3,032 t | 2,206 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1,282 t | 1,251 t | 30.94 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Belgium or Ecuador?
- Belgium, at 3,968 t against 3,108 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Belgium and Ecuador?
- 860 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ecuador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Ecuador rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Belgium ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 22nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf