Belgium vs Slovakia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Belgium
- Slovakia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 3,968 t against 3,724 t in Slovakia, a difference of 244 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 19th and Slovakia ranks 21st of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,465 t | 305.93 t | 2,159 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 826.4 t | 4,568 t | 3,741 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 1,282 t | 3,291 t | 2,009 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Belgium or Slovakia?
- Belgium, at 3,968 t against 3,724 t in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Belgium and Slovakia?
- 244 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Slovakia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Slovakia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Belgium ranks 19th and Slovakia ranks 21st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf