Botswana vs Chile: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Botswana
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 131.13 t against 128.1 t in Botswana, a difference of 3.03 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 78th and Chile ranks 76th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 292.07 t | 385.41 t | 93.34 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 164.35 t | 587.03 t | 422.68 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 715.87 t | 362.28 t | 353.59 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Botswana or Chile?
- Chile, at 131.13 t against 128.1 t in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Botswana and Chile?
- 3.03 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Botswana ranks 78th and Chile ranks 76th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf