Brazil vs Malaysia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Brazil
- Malaysia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 740,803 t against 237,343 t in Malaysia, a difference of 503,460 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 3.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malaysia ahead.
Brazil ranks 2nd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 189 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,538 t | 235,879 t | 227,341 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 3,569 t | 344,009 t | 340,440 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 216,982 t | 279,641 t | 62,658 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Brazil or Malaysia?
- Brazil, at 740,803 t against 237,343 t in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Brazil and Malaysia?
- 503,460 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malaysia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Malaysia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf