Brazil vs Viet Nam: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Brazil
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 740,803 t against 231.63 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 740,571 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 3,198.2 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,538 t | 2,488 t | 6,050 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 3,896 t | 4,674 t | 778.81 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 86,027 t | 355.76 t | 85,671 t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Brazil or Viet Nam?
- Brazil, at 740,803 t against 231.63 t in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Brazil and Viet Nam?
- 740,571 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Viet Nam rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf