Chile vs Panama: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 142.98 t against 131.13 t in Chile, a difference of 11.85 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Chile ranks 78th and Panama ranks 77th of 189 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 385.41 t | 12,207 t | 11,821 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 587.03 t | 5,541 t | 4,954 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 316.05 t | 840.89 t | 524.83 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 142.98 t against 131.13 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Chile and Panama?
- 11.85 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 78th and Panama ranks 77th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf