Dominica vs Pakistan: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Dominica
2.01 t
in 2023
Pakistan
2 t
in 2024
Dominica rank
156th
Pakistan rank
157th
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Dominica
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 2.01 t against 2 t in Pakistan, a difference of 0.01 t.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 156th and Pakistan ranks 157th of 189 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.1 t | 65 t | 41.9 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.5983 t | 479.5 t | 478.9 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.02 t | 64.5 t | 63.48 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Dominica or Pakistan?
- Dominica, at 2.01 t against 2 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Dominica and Pakistan?
- 0.01 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Pakistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Dominica and Pakistan rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Dominica ranks 156th and Pakistan ranks 157th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf