Dominica vs Sri Lanka: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Dominica
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 2.01 t against 1.17 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.84 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.7 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 144th and Sri Lanka ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.6 t | 3,046 t | 3,035 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.1475 t | 1,741 t | 1,741 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1.02 t | 689.59 t | 688.56 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Dominica or Sri Lanka?
- Dominica, at 2.01 t against 1.17 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Dominica and Sri Lanka?
- 0.84 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Dominica and Sri Lanka rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Dominica ranks 144th and Sri Lanka ranks 147th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf