Ecuador vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity

Ecuador
3,108 t
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2,343 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
21st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
23rd

Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time

  • Ecuador
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
010.0k20.0k30.0k200220132024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3,108 t against 2,343 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 765 t.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 23rd of 175 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 3,700 t 19,315 t 15,615 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 3,032 t 7,754 t 4,722 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 1,251 t 2,686 t 1,435 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ecuador or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Ecuador, at 3,108 t against 2,343 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ecuador and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
765 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
Ecuador ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 23rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-quantity-2/ecuador/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-quantity-2/ecuador/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Ecuador vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
220 places, 3,994 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf