El Salvador vs Guinea-Bissau: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 37.57 t against 37.29 t in El Salvador, a difference of 0.28 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 105th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 104th of 174 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,431 t | 0.02 t | 2,431 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 6,176 t | 34.65 t | 6,141 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, El Salvador or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 37.57 t against 37.29 t in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.28 t, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 105th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 104th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf