Ethiopia vs Maldives: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 7.5 t against 5 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 2.5 t.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.5 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 146th and Maldives ranks 144th of 189 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,536 t | 6.86 t | 9,529 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 98.89 t | 20.19 t | 78.7 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 20.44 t | 3.96 t | 16.48 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Ethiopia or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 7.5 t against 5 t in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Ethiopia and Maldives?
- 2.5 t, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Maldives?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Maldives rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 146th and Maldives ranks 144th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf