Georgia vs Luxembourg: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Georgia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 24 t against 23.16 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.84 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 127th and Luxembourg ranks 129th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 136.77 t | 72.08 t | 64.68 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 40.52 t | 52.77 t | 12.25 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 15.22 t | 27.22 t | 11.99 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Georgia or Luxembourg?
- Georgia, at 24 t against 23.16 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Georgia and Luxembourg?
- 0.84 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Luxembourg?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Luxembourg rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Georgia ranks 127th and Luxembourg ranks 129th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf