Germany vs Zambia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Germany
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 754.68 t against 604.43 t in Germany, a difference of 150.25 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 55th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70,605 t | 3,897 t | 66,708 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 38,370 t | 5,308 t | 33,062 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 85.71 t | 2,704 t | 2,618 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Germany or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 754.68 t against 604.43 t in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Germany and Zambia?
- 150.25 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Zambia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Germany ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 55th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf