Guyana vs Slovakia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Guyana
- Slovakia
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 4,183 t against 3,724 t in Slovakia, a difference of 459 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 17th and Slovakia ranks 20th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,750 t | 305.93 t | 7,444 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 13,599 t | 4,568 t | 9,031 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 3,009 t | 3,291 t | 282.02 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Guyana or Slovakia?
- Guyana, at 4,183 t against 3,724 t in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Guyana and Slovakia?
- 459 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Slovakia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Slovakia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Guyana ranks 17th and Slovakia ranks 20th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf