Hungary vs South Sudan: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Hungary
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 32 t against 27.44 t in Hungary, a difference of 4.56 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 117th and South Sudan ranks 114th of 189 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,169 t | 12.06 t | 2,157 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 1,933 t | 32 t | 1,901 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Hungary or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 32 t against 27.44 t in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Hungary and South Sudan?
- 4.56 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and South Sudan rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Hungary ranks 117th and South Sudan ranks 114th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf