Indonesia vs Türkiye: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Indonesia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1.81 million t against 49.55 t in Türkiye, a difference of 1.81 million t.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 1st and Türkiye ranks 4th of 175 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 306,213 t | 36.11 t | 306,177 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1.09 million t | 2,402 t | 1.09 million t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 1.44 million t | 42.63 t | 1.44 million t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Indonesia or Türkiye?
- Indonesia, at 1.81 million t against 49.55 t in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Indonesia and Türkiye?
- 1.81 million t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Türkiye rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Indonesia ranks 1st and Türkiye ranks 4th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf